
Once isolated and analog, fire alarm systems have entered the digital era. Cloud-based monitoring, intelligent analytics, and integrated facility dashboards are changing how fire systems are designed and managed. But with connectivity comes vulnerability.
The 2025 edition of NFPA 72 codifies what the industry has long anticipated: cybersecurity is now a core component of fire and life safety design. For the first time, the code introduces a dedicated chapter on cyber protection, underscoring the need to secure detection and communication networks from modern digital threats.
As malicious actors exploit automation and AI to create increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks, life safety systems have emerged as an unexpected target. Unauthorized access to fire panels or cloud communication pathways could compromise not only data integrity but also system reliability during emergencies.
Industry leaders are responding by demanding SOC 2-compliant operations, encrypted data transmission, and rigorous authentication standards across connected devices. These aren’t optional features — they’re becoming baseline expectations for trusted fire system architecture.
Cybersecurity in fire protection represents a cultural shift as much as a technical one. Integrators, manufacturers, and end users must collaborate across disciplines — IT, OT, and facility safety — to establish shared accountability for secure operation.
As buildings get smarter, so must their protection systems. The next generation of fire alarm professionals will need to think like both engineers and defenders, ensuring that every networked connection strengthens life safety rather than exposing it.
1. What does it mean for a fire system to be “cloud-based”?
Cloud-based fire systems use secure internet connectivity to transmit data from panels and sensors to remote monitoring platforms. This allows facility managers and service providers to access system status, reports, and alerts in real time — without being physically onsite.
2. Why is cybersecurity now part of NFPA 72?
The 2025 edition of NFPA 72 formally acknowledges that digital connectivity introduces cyber risks to life safety systems. The new chapter outlines requirements for protecting fire alarm data, control interfaces, and communications infrastructure from unauthorized access or disruption.
3. What are the biggest cybersecurity risks for connected fire systems?
Potential threats include unauthorized remote access to panels, data interception over unsecured networks, malware on connected devices, and manipulation of alerts or supervisory signals. Each of these risks can compromise both safety and compliance.
4. How can building owners ensure their fire systems are cyber-resilient?
Owners should require SOC 2-compliant operations, encrypted data transmission, and strong authentication across all connected components. Regular system updates, network segmentation, and user-access reviews are also critical parts of good cyber hygiene.
5. Who is responsible for cybersecurity in fire systems — IT or life safety teams?
Both. Cybersecurity in fire protection is a shared responsibility between IT, OT (operational technology), and life safety professionals. Collaboration ensures that physical protection and digital defense are aligned under one secure strategy.
6. What does “SOC 2 compliance” mean in this context?
SOC 2 is an industry standard for managing customer data securely. In fire system operations, it demonstrates that a provider follows strict controls for confidentiality, integrity, and availability — key principles for connected safety infrastructure.
7. How will cloud connectivity change the role of fire alarm professionals?
Technicians and engineers will increasingly act as both system integrators and cybersecurity stewards. Understanding networking, encryption, and secure protocols will become as essential as knowledge of detection devices and code requirements.
8. Are cloud-connected fire systems reliable during an emergency?
Yes — when properly designed. Redundant communication paths, encrypted transmission, and local fail-safes ensure that life safety operations continue even if the cloud connection is interrupted.
9. How often should connected fire systems be tested or audited for cybersecurity?
At minimum, systems should undergo annual cybersecurity reviews aligned with NFPA 72 maintenance requirements. Many organizations are moving toward semiannual or continuous monitoring to keep up with evolving threats.
10. What’s the key takeaway for facility leaders?
Connectivity delivers insight, efficiency, and speed — but it also demands vigilance. By treating cybersecurity as a core element of fire protection design, organizations can build smarter, safer, and more resilient facilities.